Archive for the ‘Mobile Tech’ Category
I can’t resist posting this one, but you have to read this piece in Ars Technica on how hand held device manufacturers and the chip manufacturers who manufacture the processors for the devices are being forced to look at newer markets:
The vast bulk of the history of computing up until the present day has been about moving semiconductors from the server room to the business desktop, then from the business desktop to the first class cabin, and then from first class into coach. At this point, everyone who can afford a cheap plane ticket or a pair of Nikes is already wired to the gills with transistors, and the major bottlenecks in getting those folks to buy even more of them are mostly out of Intel’s control (i.e., screen size/quality, battery life, connectivity, usability).
To see real growth in the coming decades, Intel, AMD, and the rest of the semi industry must focus on markets where an iPhone would cost a month’s income, and then on markets where it would cost a year’s income.
This is a drum I’ve been beating for a long time that someone has to blink first and introduce a device that is a bare bones internet access device, at a price point of INR 4000 – 6000 (a Nokia E50 that supports EDGE currently costs INR 9000) and take about INR 2000 per unit of that as cost for a couple of years to kill the penetration issue and unleash internet access on the masses, like how it happened with mobile phones.
A fairly usable unlimited data plan on Airtel these days (Mobile Office) costs INR 500 per month. A proper device (the right form factor much in the lines of PSP and a full QWERTY keyboard) along these lines can set the market on fire and give the ever-hungry telcos a whole new breed of consumers and the silicon guys a new market to power using their new chips.
What is even better is that EDGE works pretty much around the country, essentially meaning that you get decent access to the internet pretty much from a whole host of places where it is just not available due to various reasons (Airtel refuses to provide me with a DSL link till they can find some more people from the same area).
The critical factor in all of this is getting someone to blink. Such a device would not find much uptake without the telcos actively pushing it. But, for all of this to happen, someone has to go out of the way and place themselves in the risky position of being the first ones to open up a new market.
I guess we are still a bit away from any of the players getting that desperate, but I guess the time is not too far off before something like that will happen.
Peter Cranstone, while pondering how the Google phone will deliver ads to its users, says that Google will have to do something similar to what Opera does with Opera Mini — transcoding web pages — for the Google phone. He adds that once Google gets around to doing this it will beat the crap out of Opera Mini, which probably won’t find much agreement with Russell Beattie, who argues that someone should buy Opera just for the traffic that is now routed through Opera Mini.
What both gentlemen are probably not aware of is that Google already has a transcoder that converts pages into mobile-formatted on the fly. Now, rather strangely, the interface is not available anywhere as a start page as far as I know. Google does serve you a mobile-specific Google.com page depending on your User Agent, but the links that are delivered in the results page do not use the transcoder.
The only place where you can see it is if you use the mobile version of the Google Reader. In the entry-level screen on Google Reader, there is a link that says “see original,” which can also be accessed by pressing ‘0’ on your mobile phone. To access any normal page on your desktop browser via this transcoder, all you have to do is to append the URL you want to browse to the following URL: http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=. For example this blog can be accessed this way: http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=https://fatalerror.wordpress.com.
Currently, the transcoder supports most standard HTML, including forms, which means that you get to access things like email on the go even on a very low-fi handset, and also that Google gets another bit of your personal information (did I hear the privacy paranoid let out a collective gasp there?) for it to index and profile. The good part of the story is that it refuses to transcode secure URLs, which I remember was not the case with Opera Mini.
Now, here I also have to admit here that Opera Mini does a stellar job, but it also has a problem that you need to have J2ME support to be able to use it. Besides, the Google transcoder seems to be considerably faster while transcoding and rendering pages. For all you know, Google maybe licensing Opera’s technology to do this (imagine: Opera Mini kills Opera Mini. What a headline!), but from what I remember Opera is running a mightily hacked up version of the Opera browser as middleware to make Opera Mini possible, while Google’s approach seems to be in line with the more standard HTML Tidy/HTML Cleaner/HTML Parser/Tagsoup approach to de-mucking web pages, albeit a monstrously hacked version of it.