Blue Screen Of Duds

Where the alter ego of codelust plays


with 2 comments

If you ever wanted to see a deployment of the classic smokescreen tactic, all you need to do is turn to our dear telecom industry for help. For a better idea of what I am talking about, try parsing the following statement by Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (AUSPI) and Reliance on the government’s idea to enforce strict Quality of Service norms for broadband services in India:

“It is seen that compared to most of the countries in Asia and the West, where broadband usage is growing, our country still lags behind. As such, the focus right now should be on both supply side and demand side of the broadband market, that is, creating and deploying broadband-capable infrastructure in the country as well as stimulating the use of broadband in the country. We need to focus on creating the need and deployment of broadband in the country.”

Most of the companies who comprise the association are the ones who are responsible for doing the “creating and deploying” of broadband in India and the ‘usage’ that is being mentioned is something that follows the first part. So what exactly is the government doing wrong by asking for strict measures to ensure that the so-called broadband being peddled around by the same companies is what it claims to be? Essentially, what they are asking for is to be allowed to deliver an abysmal (and overpriced) level of service to the customer, without being held accountable for it, all in the name of helping broadband grow in the country.

According to VSNL, the problem they are facing with regards to any kind of QoS is “linked to adequate last mile access”. REACH Ltd meanwhile does not want the TRAI ” to attribute service failures to operators in India” because “circumstances giving rise to service failure are beyond operators’ control”. Effectively, what they are arguing is that they don’t have much control over either end of the service. I can sympathise a little bit about the last mile problem, though VSNL/Tata Indicom should have nothing to cry about it and service providers who tie up with the local cablewallah to cut corners and costs should not cry wolf about the same thing.

But the gem of all the statements is provided by AUSPI and Reliance Infocomm, who must have hired a wind tunnel to supply the requisite amount of air power to generate the smoke required, in saying “Internet is a best effort service. It is the interconnecting of several networks worldwide that form the Internet. Many of these networks are proprietary and, therefore, their performance norms have to be complied with”. If networks participating in the Internet were proprietary, there would be no Internet at all. BGP4 that is used for routing on almost all of the Internet is an open standard. Even if they mean to say privately held by using “proprietary” in its place all I can ask is “so what?” Being a private company somehow enables you to justify even lousier service levels? I think not.

On ground zero this is the situation today. Almost every broadband service provider advertises ‘broadband’ connections at dirt cheap prices. When you look closer the finer print steps out from all the smoke. It is almost always a service with ridiculously low data transfer rates (as low as 250 MB for a month at times) or a package that will give you the mandatory 256 Kbps connection only for a higher rater, which is signified by the asterisk you see in the advertisements. Every time you log into your GMail account, it pulls around 700 KB worth of data from Google. It does not take a math wizard to figure out for how long, using just Gmail, you can survive on an account that gives you only 250 MB of data transfer.

But that is another story altogether and has nothing to do with the QoS they are talking about here. They don’t want to sign up for the stricter norms because then they can’t get away with unexplainable downtimes or speeds that are often 1/3rd of what is advertised. On one of the packages I used to be on earlier, the network would disappear more often than not and it used to be a time limited unlimited data transfer package. In the current scenario I can’t complain about it to anyone. Speed, which is another benchmark for quality, is equally pathetic. Even on a 64 Kbps line we are used to considering ourselves fortunate if we’d get 11 Kbps maximum. Mind you, this was not because the trunk lines being cut anywhere or the cablewallah’s cables being cut, it was because of the service provider using throttling to lock the users down to the barest minimum of speeds.

TRAI’s consultation paper released on May 23, 2006 defines broadband as “an ‘always-on’ data connection that is able to support interactive services including Internet access and has the capability of the minimum download speed of 256 kilo bits per second (kbps) to an individual subscriber from the Point Of Presence (POP) of the service provider..” If that were taken seriously 80% of the connections masquerading as broadband would have to be taken off the market.

Moreover, it also aims to fix the QoS based on the following parameters:

(i) Network latency
(ii) Packet loss
(iii) Bandwidth utilization/throughput
(iv) Service provision/ activation time
(v) Service availability/uptime
(vi) Fault repair/ restoration time
(vii) Static IP address allocation

All of which would force the service providers to clean up their act and actually help India prosper via the broadband route than to just help the providers get richer and richer while the poor users have nowhere to run when the are treated in the most despicable manner.

Blaming faulty STM links is not an excuse. Any self respecting service provider worth his name these days use multiple STM connections (guess who controls most of the long distance links in that segment of the market? VSNL!) and satellite links to keep their services running. Last mile connectivity is not again an issue for most broadband service providers. VSNL, Reliance, Airtel all have it and if there is a problem in that, it is something internal to the companies and it has nothing to do what the government can or cannot do. Of course, we still have the pipe dream of unbundling of the last mile access on existing telephone networks, but that is another story altogether.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,


Written by shyam

June 28, 2006 at 12:05 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Dear Mr. Shyam,
    A lot of what you say is true. Let me share this side of the fence with you. I have been with the so called “broadband ” industry since the time it started.

    I have seen the speeds go from a crying shame to a decent level that they are now.

    The poor ISP is blamed for all the woes of the world but thats far from the truth. The problem is very simple as far as I can see and it all started from the goverments interference in the old days. The govt in its wiseness gave a monopoly to VSNL. Then it opened the sector to private players.

    Guess what, the private players had in the begining no choice but to buy from VSNL , who of course had differencial pricing , one for the metros and one for cities like Nasik / pune away from their NOCs. This differencial pricing was only for ISPs etc whereas the common man who bought a VSNL pack in mumbai and wanted to surf in Nasik , could still do so at the same rupee per hour. This meant that the private player had to sell dial up etc at Mumbai rates but buy backend bandwidth at Nasik rates. KERCHACK- first death knell for ISPs

    The the market matured and we got the so called broadband. Voila, another money makng oppurtunity knocked for the inumbents which had grown for 1 to about 5 by now. They were the ones who controlled the international fibre and landing station. They of course sold bandwidth at cheaper rates directly to corporates but the ISP buying outgoing routes from them had to sell it more expensive since they could not buy directly from international players. KERCHUNG —second death knell

    Last blow is when the jumbo providers enter a city and start selling so called broadband with asterisks at losing rates since they have deep pockets and in effect are wiping out the competetion.

    As to the small supplier – well he has no option but to try and meet the price set by one of the big 5 since the customer refuses to look at the asterisk till it comes and bites him in the soft areas of his tushie, and sometimes not even then since he is so used to being taken for a merry go round trip.

    In order to meet that ridiculous schemes set up by the larger players, what does the small ISP do, he makes bandwidth packages to meet the needs of the customer with asterisks to match since you cant sell oranges in the market of apples. We can all guess the end to that.

    At an early stage , we at GTTPL decided that this would not be our avenue. Very rarely do we see an intelligent article like yours and let us commend you on it.

    We hope you would have no objection to us circulating your article as a wake up call to some of our customers.


    February 7, 2007 at 12:43 pm

  2. I don’t have any objections, you can use it.


    February 7, 2007 at 1:48 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: